n8n vs Make — Feature Comparison
| Feature | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Ease of Use | 6.8 | 7.5 |
| Value for Money | 9.5 | 9.2 |
| Raw Power | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Free Plan | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Paid Plan | $20/mo | $9/mo |
| Context Window | — | — |
Ease of Use: n8n vs Make
Make is significantly easier for beginners — drag, drop, connect. n8n has a steeper learning curve but gives you far more control.
Value for Money: n8n vs Make
n8n is better value at scale — the self-hosted version is free forever. Make charges based on operations which adds up quickly on high-volume workflows.
Raw Power: n8n vs Make
n8n wins on AI agent capabilities, code nodes, and self-hosting. Make wins on pre-built templates and speed of setup.
Verdict: It Depends on Your Use Case
n8n wins for technical teams who want self-hosting and advanced AI agent workflows. Make wins for non-technical users who need fast visual automation without code.
Some links above may earn AI Rated a commission at no cost to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is n8n better than Make?
For technical users and AI agent workflows, yes. For non-technical users who need quick automation, Make is easier and faster to get started.
Can n8n replace Zapier?
Yes — n8n covers most Zapier use cases and is significantly cheaper, especially self-hosted. The tradeoff is a higher technical requirement.
Is n8n free?
n8n is free to self-host. The cloud version starts at $20/mo. Make has a free plan limited to 1,000 operations per month.
Which is better for AI workflows — n8n or Make?
n8n is ahead on AI agent workflows with dedicated AI nodes and LangChain integration. Make has AI modules but they are less flexible.